you believe that Oswald assassinated JFK. Don't read this if you believe that 911 was not orchestrated by our government for monetary, political, and... to enact the "Patriot Act" (which was already written prior to 911) to spy and constrict our personal freedoms. Please watch the You Tube video presented by Barbara Honeggar, M.S. called, "Behind the Smoke Curtain", regarding the truth behind 911. Don't read this if you think our voting system was not corrupted during this past election. Don't read this if you believe that the vaccine is safe (you know what's in it and its been properly tested) and/or Big Pharma and our Government have our best interests in mind. And finally, don't read this if you think the vaccine and mask wearing is not about power, money, separation and division.
Ok, that out of the way, for those few that are still reading.... here goes:
The main body of information for this blog was taken from a video produced on July 9th, 2021. The video is titled, "A manufactured illusion", by Dr. David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich.
Dr. David Martin is the chairman of M-CAM International Innovation Risk Management. From a corporate standpoint since 1998 M-CAM has been the world's largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. The underwriting systems include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, e-government records, etc. M-CAM has the ability to not only track what is happening and who is involved in what is happening, but they monitor a series of thematic interests for a variety of organizations and individuals as well as for their own commercial use. M-CAM maintains three global equity indices which are the top performing large cap and mid cap equity indexes world wide.
M-CAM's business is to monitor innovation around the world and the economics of that innovation, the degree to which financial interests are being served, corporate interests are being dislocated, etc. Their business is the business of innovation and its finance.
M-CAM has reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around the SARS/CORONA virus and have done a very comprehensive review of the financing of all of the manipulations of CORONA virus which gave rise to SARS as a sub-clade of the beta CORONA virus family. Here is a quick time line overview of the patent applications specifically related to the SARS/CORONA virus. There is a document that was made public in the spring of 2020. This document referenced in the video is extremely important because M-CAM took the reported gene sequence which was reportedly isolated as a novel-Corona virus indicated as such by the ICTV (the international committee on taxonomy of viruses of the world health organization). M-CAM took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly 'novel' and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020. What they found was over a 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel Corona virus was actually entirely a fallacy.
There was no novel Corona virus. There are countless very subtle modifications of Corona virus sequences that have been up-loaded but there was no single identified novel Corona virus at all. As a matter of fact C-MAC found records in the patent records of sequences attributed to novelty going to patents that were sought as early as 1999. So, not only was this not a novel anything, its not been novel for over two decades.
Here is a short journey through the patent landscape to crystalize the process as it unfolds. The patent process regarding Corona virus was uniquely applied to veterinary sciences. The first vaccine ever patented for Corona virus was actually sought by Pfizer. The application for the first vaccine for Corona virus which was specifically this S spike protein was the exact same thing that supposedly was rushed into invention. The first application for this "vaccine" was filed January 28th, 2000, twenty one years ago. So the idea that we mysteriously stumbled on the way to intervene on vaccines is not only ludicrous it is incredulous.
Timothy Miller, Sharon Klepfer, Albert Paul Reed and Elaine Jones on January 28th 2000 filled what ultimately was issued as US Patent 6372224 which was the spike protein virus vaccine for the canine Corona virus which is actually one of the multiple forms of Corona virus. But the early work up until 1999 was largely focused in the area of vaccines for animals. The two animals receiving the most attention were probably Ralph Barris work with rabbits and the rabbit cardio myopathy that was the problem associated amongst rabbit breeders. And then canine Corona virus which was Pfizer's work to identify how to create S spike protein vaccine target candidates. Giving rise to the obvious evidence that says neither the Corona virus concept of a vaccine nor the principle of the Corona virus itself as a pathogen of interest with respect to the spike protein's behavior is anything novel at all. As a matter of fact its 22 years old based on patent files.
Whats more problematic and what is actually the most egregious problem is that Anthony Fauci and NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease) found the malleability of Corona virus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines. And so SARS is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of Corona virus. As a matter of fact very specifically in 1999 Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, specifically to create (this info came from a patent filled April 19th 2002) by the NIAID an infectious replication defective Corona virus. That was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. Another words... we made SARS and we patented it on April 19th 2002, before there was ever any alleged out break in Asia. Which, as you know followed that by several months. That patent issued as US patent 7279327 clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew that the ace receptor the ace two binding domain and the S one spike protein and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory. This, using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. That technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness Corona virus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.
It gets worse...C-MAC was asked to monitor chemical and biological weapons, treaty violations in the very early days of 2000. The anthrax events in September of 2001 were looked into by C-MAC. Their investigation led to a congressional inquiry into not only the anthrax origins but also into what was unusual behavior around Bayer's super Floxin drug which was a drug used as a potential treatment for anthrax poisoning. Through-out the fall of 2001 C-Mac began to monitor an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through NIH (National Institute of Health), NIAID, USAMRDC (US Armed Services Infectious Disease Program), and a number of other agencies internationally that collaborated with them.
C-MAC had a concern that the Corona virus was being seen as not only a potential manipulatable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate.
C-MAC's first reporting on this began prior to the SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001. You can imagine how disappointed Dr. Martin is sitting here today talking about something he and his organization pointed there was a problem looming on the horizon some twenty years ago in respect to the corona virus. After the "alleged" outbreak, he says "alleged" because it is important that we understand that Corona virus as a circulating pathogen inside the viral model we have is actually not new to the human condition and not new to the last two decades. It's actually been part of the sequence of proteins that has circulated for quite a long time.
But the "alleged" outbreak that took place in China in 2002 going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filling by the CDC (United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention). This topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise. Because, in addition to filling a patent for the entire gene sequence on what became SARS CORONA virus (which is actually a violation of 35 US code section 101), you can not patent a naturally occurring substance.
The 35 US code section 101 violation was patent number 7220852, that patent also had derivative patents associated with it. These are patent applications that were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter. These include US patent 46592703P, 776521. These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS/CORONA virus but also covered the means of detecting it using the now internationally recognized RTPCR. The reason this is a problem is because if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself and you own the patent on its detection you have a cunning advantage to be able to control 100% of the providence of not only the virus itself but also its detection. Meaning you have entire scientific and message control. This patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research the corona virus.
The only problem with that statement is that it's a lie. The reason it's a lie is because the patent office not once but twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as un-patentable, because the gene sequence was already in the public domain. Over the rejection of the patent examiner and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007 the CDC over road the patent offices rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS/CORONA virus.
Every public statement the CDC has made has said this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the US patent office. This is not subtle, but to make matters worse they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. If you want the public to be able to research this it seems you wouldn't pay a fee to keep the information private.
Fact checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel corona virus designated as SARS?COV2 is in fact distinctly different from the CDC patent. Heres the genetic and the patent problem:
If you look at the gene sequence that is filed by the CDC in 2003, again in 2005 and in 2006, what you will find is identity in 89% to 99% of the sequence overlaps that identify in whats called the novel sub-clade of SARS/COV2.
What we know is that the core designation of SARS/CORONA virus which is actually the clade of the beta corona virus family and the sub-clade which has been called SARS/COV2 have to overlap from a taxonomic point of view. You can not have SARS designation on something without it first being SARS. So, the disingenuous fact checking that states the CDC has nothing to do with this particular patent or this particular pathogen is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences and its also beyond credulity when it comes to the ICTV taxonomy because it very clearly states this is a sub-clade of the clade called SARS/CORONA virus.
On the 28th of April three days after the CDC filled the patent on the SARS/CORONA virus in 2003 came an interesting sequence of events. Three days later Sequoia Pharmaceuticals (a company that was set up in Maryland) filled a patent on anti-viral agents of treatment and control of infections by the Corona virus. The CDC filled three days earlier and then the treatment was available three days later. Sequoia Pharmaceutical later was rolled into the proprietary holdings of Pfizer, Crucell, and Johnson and Johnson.
So the natural question you would ask is, "How do you have a patent on a treatment for something that had been invented three days earlier?" The patent in question, the April 28th, 2003 patent 7151163 issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals has another problem. The problem is, it was issued and published before the CDC patent on CORONA virus was actually allowed. So the degree to which the information could have been know by any means other than insider information between those two parties is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published because the CDC had paid to keep the information secret.
This my friends is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and collusion. This is not a theory, this is evidence. You can not have information in the future and then inform a treatment for a thing that did not exist.
It is not your fault you have believed the very organizations that are supposed to be looking out for our health and protecting us. Just keep an open mind while I further unravel (next week) the fairy tale we are supposed to believe while the mythical Corona deaths pile up pushing more to get the unproven vaccination proposed by those we should fear the most.
This blog is sponsored by PAZAZ™ "The Magic of Cooking" Kitchen tools for the discerning chef. Please go to www.pazazshop.com to purchase these AMAZING kitchen tools.