Our Recent Posts

Tags

No tags yet.

Censorship, Control, and Distance... Oh, My!




Dear Friends... Does it not seem just a little suspicious that videos by acclaimed virologists, immunologists, and other "experts" in the field of viruses and vaccines are being censored by social media when the narrative doesn't comply with the federal governments narrative? This is the last blog I will write concerning this subject. "A person convinced against their will is of the same opinion."


First: The PCR Test


The PCR tests don't work to diagnose infection with Covid 19. What is the scientific proof these tests don't work? Anyone that has researched this (not the Sheepal) meaning the people that are not bound by a political motivation or egotistical dementia (or ED) realize a couple things:


The danger of false positives is exacerbated by too many cycles being run. Another words if you run the test at 30 cycles or more the results are very likely to be junk and any positives meaningless. Incredibly most labs performing these tests have done just that running the cycles at 30 or more even up to 45 cycles. Even lord of the manner Anthony Fauci admitted this was a problem and the test would be an anomaly.


The tests weren't designed using real viral RNA from the "Alleged" Sars-Cov-2 virus. They use "synthetic RNA" or "contrived sources" because there was no isolated samples of Sars-Cov-2 available. Even the WHO released a guidance memo December 14th 2020 warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.


The "Gold Standard" Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR

works by taking nucleotides (tiny fragments of DNA or RNA) and replacing them until they

become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with

each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce

something identifiable is known as the "cycle threshold" or "CT value". The higher the "CT

value", the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant. This new WHO memo states

that using a high "CT value" to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false positive

results.

The CDC says that the 59 different PCR tests on the market can't have their performance

compared because all used different "contrived samples" for their production. On a side bar:

The FDA warned against using the Innova rapid COVID-19 antigen tests. The FDA issued a

class one recall against this Innova rapid Covid-19 antigen test. That is the most severe recall

warning issued by the FDA. The FDA says that the use of or exposure to this product will have

adverse health consequences or death. This product is still being used in the UK.


Dr. Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn't

meant as a diagnostic tool, saying: "With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in

anybody."


Second: The Mask


Dr. Dan Stock from PureHealth Functional Medicine in Indiana suggests we are listening to the CDC which unfortunately doesn't bother to read science. Dr. Stock is trained in immunology and inflammation regulation, and he states, "Everything being recommended by the CDC is actually contrary to all the rules of science. So the thing you should know about the Corona virus and all other respiratory viruses is that they are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through any mask. In fact the studies that support this fact were actually sponsored by the NIH. "


Third: The Virus


June 5th, 2008, this is a very important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency) actively took an interest in Corona virus as a biological weapon. June 5th, 2008, Ablynx which is now apart of Sanofi filled a series of patents that specifically

targeted what we've been told is the novel feature of the Sars Cov 2 virus. They targeted what was called the poly basic cleavage site for Sars Cov , the novel spike protein and the ace 2 receptor binding domain which is allegedly novel to Sars Cov 2 and all of that was patented on the 5th of June 2008. Those patents in sequence were issued between Nov 24th of 2015 which was US patent 9193780 so that one came out after the gain of function moratorium and after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East.


What you find is in 2016/2017/2019 a series of patents all covering not only the RNA strands but also the sub-components of the gene strands were all issued to Ablynx and Sanofi. Then we have Cryselle, Rubius Therapeutics, Childrens Medical Corporation, and countless others that include Ludwig Maximilian's University of Munich, Protein Science Corporation, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong, all identifying in patent filings that ranged from 2008 until 2017 every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published by the single reference publication the Novel Bat Corona virus reveals "natural insertions of the S1 S2 cleavage site of the spike protein and possible reconomite 3 origin of the Sars Cov 2 virus. The paper that has been routinely used to identify, unfortunately if you actually take what they report to be novel you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the Sars Cov 2. Specifically as it relates to the poly basic cleavage site the ace 2 receptor binding domain and the spike protein.


So the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious, Sars Cov 2... there was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that virus. By 2016 the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said the Sars Corona virus was poised for human emergence (written by none other than Ralph Baric professor in the department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill). This virus was not only poised for "human emergence" but was patented for commercial exploitation... 73 times. Ralph Baric has made a lot of money from this social experiment to our detriment.


So for those of you that want to live in the illusion that some way or another this is the end of the story, be prepared for an even greater disappointment. Somebody new something because in 2015/2016 which gave rise to my favorite quote from this entire pandemic. A statement made in 2015 by Peter Daszak (the head of ECOHealth Alliance) reported in the National Academies of Press Publication February 12, 2016, "We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical counter measures such as a pan/corona virus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process."


Peter Daszak was the person that independently corroborated the false narrative that there was a Chinese lab leak of the Corona virus. This was not that...this was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan/corona virus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released and every study that's ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring. 73 patents on everything clinically novel, all issued before 2019.


Here is the biggest bombshell of all to prove this was actually not a release of anything because patent 7279327 the patent on the recombinant nature of that lung targeting Corona virus was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institute of Health in 2018. Here's the problem with that, according to the Bayh-Dole Act the US government already has what's called a "march in right provision". That means if the US government has paid for research, they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand or at their whim.


So explain why in 2017 and 2018 suddenly the National Institute of Health have to take ownership of the patent they already had the rights to held by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill? Also, why did they need to file a certificate of correction to make sure it was legally enforceable? Why, because there was a typographical error in the grant reference in the first filling. So they needed to make sure that not only did they need to get it right but they needed to make sure that every typographical error that was contained in the patent was correct. On the single patent required to develop the vaccine research Institutes mandate which was shared between the University of Carolina Chapel Hill in November of 2019 and Moderna when UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID, and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine. A month before an outbreak ever happened.


This blog is sponsored by PAZAZ™ "The Magic of Cooking" Kitchen tools for the discerning chef. Please go to www.pazazshop.com to purchase these AMAZING Kitchen Tools.